The Resource For Musicals



Les Miserables Forum


Reply to topic  [ 73 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next
Les Miserables in Los Angeles at the Ahmanson Theatre 
Author Message
Broadway Legend
Broadway Legend

Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 1:06 pm
Posts: 792
Post Re: Les Miserables in Los Angeles at the Ahmanson Theatre
mastachen wrote:
he must have had an off-day singing because his voice cracked 3 times - during the high note in Who Am I, when he confronts Javert coming out of the sewers, and again in the finale.


It must have been an off-day, because I saw the show the night before last and I don't remember a single crack. I thought he did a great job both dramatically and vocally.

Quote:
In the Confrontation, after he and Valjean fights, he scampers away from him towards the wall. It was a weird sight, because Javert really shouldn't scamper.


It was kind of weird, but I bought it, since after all, he had just been f•••ing strangled with a chain! What did you think of the fact that Valjean now does that instead of threatening him with a chair leg?

I really liked the show when I saw it the other night. Even though neither the production nor the cast was perfect, they were very good, better than I expected even. I'd definitely rank it on the same level as the performance I saw with the final 3rd National Tour cast in 2006.

Expect a review within the next few days. :)


Sat Jun 18, 2011 1:23 pm
Profile
Broadway Legend / MdN Veteran
Broadway Legend / MdN Veteran
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2004 6:17 am
Posts: 3976
Location: In a Lesbian trench coat.
Current Obsession: Being Squeaky.
Main Role: Fan
Post Re: Les Miserables in Los Angeles at the Ahmanson Theatre
I've read more than enough reviews from people whose opinions I value and trust (like the two peeps above me ^ ^ ;) ), that I know I will like it. I already love it as a musical itself. I practically worship the story and score and it stars a couple of actors in the leads whom I just adore. There will be much criticism to details (by the way, I don't believe them petty at all. Details are what do it for me, and to most everyone else, whether they're aware of it, or not) when I get the chance to write up my own review. :mrgreen:

But for the time being, I'd like to address a different matter of concern.

You know, I love my musical theatre, and I've happily paid top ticket prices for those prime seats. There's absolutely nothing like the feeling of feeling you're in the midst of all the onstage action; the performances up close and personal; dodging spit, roflmao.

I went on and checked to see availability for tonight and beyond and I will say the prices quoted are unprecedented, even for a classic, hit musical.

$200 for main floor, orchestra seats. $130 for seats off the the sides. Really? You have got to be sh*tting me.

I wasn't born yesterday, and always knew this restaging is more of a repackaging and simplification for further profit boosting purposes at a time the musical is getting widespread exposure. The assistant that staged it even fumbles with the rationale behind it all in a recent Associated Press interview, inadvertently complimenting the original while basically calling their own a practice of change for the sake of change that loses a very effective dynamic and replaces it with some unique language nonsense. In other words, it's different, cheaper, and more effective on Cammack's bank accounts.

Cameron Mackintosh and Center Theatre Group should be ashamed of themselves.

_________________
Image


Sat Jun 18, 2011 2:33 pm
Profile
Broadway Legend / MdN Veteran
Broadway Legend / MdN Veteran
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 17, 2002 10:18 pm
Posts: 3147
Location: NYC as of 2011. Formerly SF Bay Area.
Current Obsession: punctuation
Main Role: Fan
Post Re: Les Miserables in Los Angeles at the Ahmanson Theatre
Doesn't CTG charge at or near Broadway prices for non-Equity tours, too? No surprise, really.

_________________
The Very Angry Woman

The Very Angry Man has retired from musicals.net.
_________________
This just in! People can be mean on the internet. (NPR)


Sat Jun 18, 2011 7:01 pm
Profile WWW
Broadway Legend / MdN Veteran
Broadway Legend / MdN Veteran
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2004 6:17 am
Posts: 3976
Location: In a Lesbian trench coat.
Current Obsession: Being Squeaky.
Main Role: Fan
Post Re: Les Miserables in Los Angeles at the Ahmanson Theatre
The highest I've ever paid for a show in my life is a little over a hundred for one seat. I understand Broadway and many touring houses across the country are now offering these lame "Premium" seats, a practice that isn't exclusive to Les Mis or CTG, I should point out.

But $200 for any show is clearly too much and I've long lost faith. I thought this version was supposed to be more accessible? I guess that only meant dumbing it down artistically because I don't see how this slimmed down version will get more of the people who didn't have a chance to see it before an opportunity to attend if they have to spend the wads of cash they are demanding. What's the use of it fitting the stage of some hole-in-the-wall community center if you're going to charge double? Especially when the 3rd NT fit hole-in-the-wall community centers and charged half the price (and was better than what's currently on offer :twisted: ).

It's been the same story at every venue. I just thought CTG wouldn't buy into it and charge the standard $100 per seat, which is already quite a fistful of money.

SHAME!!!!11!111

_________________
Image


Sat Jun 18, 2011 7:39 pm
Profile
Tony Winner
Tony Winner

Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 290
Location: Somerville, NJ
Post Re: Les Miserables in Los Angeles at the Ahmanson Theatre
I'm actually shocked that prices would be that high; it must depend on the venue. When I saw the tour at the Papermill, prime orchestra seating was $92, without any sort of discount codes, etc., comparable to other productions of similar scale that play there. Guess the producers saw a hot ticket with the NJ stop and adjusted following stops accordingly...

I apologize for residents of my state being so eager to see it! I fear we may have ruined it for the rest of you lot.


Sat Jun 18, 2011 9:05 pm
Profile
Broadway Legend
Broadway Legend

Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 1:13 pm
Posts: 1886
Post Re: Les Miserables in Los Angeles at the Ahmanson Theatre
I started donating and buying season tickets to CTG a few years ago precisely because they were cheaper than Broadway/LA. This trend is fairly recent too. Next to Normal at the Ahmanson late last year was priced in the $80s, but for God of Carnage, the prices skyrocketed to $120s, and for Les Mis, it went even higher. I had thought that they charged that much for God of Carnage because James Gandolfini, Marcia Gay Harden, etc. were in it, but what's Les Mis's excuse.

$20 hot tix for Les Miserables will be released next Tuesday. The fun is in not knowing what seats you're gonna get.


Sat Jun 18, 2011 11:38 pm
Profile
Broadway Legend
Broadway Legend

Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 1:06 pm
Posts: 792
Post Re: Les Miserables in Los Angeles at the Ahmanson Theatre
Massive Review: Les Misérables at the Ahmanson Theatre, June 16, 8:00 PM
Part I: The Production

When I arrived at the Ahmanson, I was both excited and nervous. I adore "Les Mis", I hadn’t seen a professional performance of it since 2007 (not counting the Hollywood Bowl concert), and between the reviews I’d read of the UK Tour and what I’d heard of it on the cast recording, I didn’t know if I’d like the new US Tour or not. I was afraid, (1) that the production would be nothing but kitsch combined with rehash of the original, (2) that the whole thing would feel rushed, (3) that the actors would do too much yelling and screaming, and (4) that they would all make their characters too angry and too modern.

I was pleasantly surprised. First of all, I like the new production. Is it perfect? No. Is it better than the original production? Certainly not. But it’s a very good production, with good set design, good costumes and good staging all around. I’ll describe my thoughts in more detail below. Nor, in my opinion, does it feel like only “a fresh coat of paint.” True, it rehashes some aspects of the original, namely some of the more iconic costumes and blocking, but for the most part, to me at least, it feels very new and inventive. Nor was it rushed (there were plenty of beautiful dramatic pauses), nor was there too much yelling, nor did anyone (in general) seem too angry, and the characterizations felt perfectly “period.” Those were my biggest fears when I arrived and they were all refuted.

Below are my detailed opinions on the performance. Just to let everyone know, I won’t be discussing the orchestrations: that’s Quique’s expertise, not mine, and I didn’t give them much attention. Also, I’m writing this review as much to remember the performance by as to tell you about it, so I’ll be describing production details that most of you already know, either from seeing it yourselves, from other reviews or from the online storyboard. I hope no one minds.


Set Design: The basic set is essentially an altered version of John Napier’s original: a dark brick structure framed by dark wood, with two walls framing the stage. Each wall has a balcony and a space for entrances and exits – the one at stage right has a door, used for the Bishop’s house and later Valjean’s house at Rue Plumet, while the one at stage left contains a tunnel, used for lower-class characters’ entrances and later as the gateway to the sewers. These walls are moveable and occasionally slide together at center stage to create an image of cramped, squalid tenements – this is done in “Look Down” and in “Éponine’s Errand.”

So far so good, but what makes this production distinctive, as we all know from advertisements, the online storyboard, the O2 concert, etc, is its use of film projections based on Victor Hugo’s drawings and paintings. These dusky, moody, impressionistic images of Paris streets, ship riggings, trees, a church, etc, create a stylized atmosphere, while at the same time giving every scene a more concrete location than the original black box did. I love this concept. I’m not saying it’s better than the original, but I love it. It gives the production a look and an atmosphere both unique and entirely appropriate for the story. Granted, the projections in the sewer scene are a little bit showy and melodramatic, in the cinematic way they move and change to convey Valjean’s journey, but that’s my only semi-complaint. Even the occasional surrealistic imagery (as Valjean sings of “the whirlpool of my sin,” a bright red whirlpool appears behind him, and in the final scene Hugo’s painting “Planet” appears as a symbol of Heaven) is surprisingly effective.

The production’s more concrete sense of place means that certain scenes are given settings where my mind had never placed them before. Javert sings “Stars” on the very bridge from which he later leaps to his death – an effective choice. “Every Day” and “Valjean’s Confession” take place in a garden, with Marius and Cosette sitting on a bench – iffier, but not offensive. And the café scene is clearly in a basement room with window grates. By the way, I seem to remember someone (I think it was Orestes) complaining that in this new production, everything from “Look Down” through the “Bring Him Home” all seems to take place in one night – I disagree. The café window grates have enough light streaming through them to make me interpret that scene as a daytime one (granted, Marius sings "Had you been there tonight," but maybe it takes place just at dawn), and it’s still easy to assume that Act II begins on the following night, not the same night as the end of Act I.

In addition to the projected backdrops, the production also includes wooden staircases, and occasional rickety wooden structures that suggest buildings, e.g. for the Thénardiers’ inn. These slide on and offstage as needed. Big scene changes are handled via two giant sliding walls consisting almost entirely of shuttered windows, which temporarily hide the bulk of the stage from sight. These not only slide, but open like doors at key moments, e.g. for the poor to come streaming out to sing “At the End of the Day,” and to reveal the courtroom in “Who Am I?” All in all, very well thought-out visuals. I was also happy to see various shout-outs to the novel. The factory is, accurately, a jet factory, with all the women sitting at a long table stringing beads; as Valjean and Young Cosette leave the inn, snow falls, evoking the fact that Hugo has him come for her at Christmas; and during “Empty Chairs,” the café has the name Café Musain written on it. Of course there are also a few inaccuracies – the Prologue portraying Valjean as an actual galley slave on a ship; Montreuil-sur-Mer shown as having an active seaport – but even these are moments of artistic license that work well from a theatrical standpoint.


Costumes: As we all know from production photos, a fair amount of of Adrienne Neofitou’s original designs are used (e.g. Javert, Éponine, Enjolras, the Thénardiers in Act I), but there are also plenty of new costumes, and I’ll describe the standouts.
1. Fantine’s first costume is now a slim blue dress with a stripe pattern, which I thought was very pretty and fitting for her character, and her whore outfit is nothing but underwear. She also has her long hair again when she appears as a spirit in the finale.
2. The students generally wear brighter colors, except Grantaire, who wears a shoddy-looking beige overcoat.
3. In addition to the standard working-class costumes, some of the “Turning” women wear wealthy-looking dresses and bonnets. Presumably these women are relatives and/or fiancées of the students.
4. The Thénardiers have new costumes for “Beggars at the Feast” – while I liked Mme. T.’s feather-covered magenta gown, I didn’t care for her husband’s tailcoat with its enormous cartoony collar.
5. As we all know from the O2 concert, Cosette now wears a puffy blue striped dress and is wigged to have long blonde hair like her mother’s. Personally, I like this look. It may not convey her sheltered status the way her original black dress does, but it’s pretty, more period authentic than the black dress, and its lightness and cheerfulness fit with her status as a symbol of hope. Also, her dress’s color and pattern are similar to those of Fantine’s. Combined with the blonde hair, I think this helps the audience remember that she’s Fantine’s daughter and emphasizes that thanks to Valjean’s efforts, she lives the happy life that her mother dreamed of in vain.


Staging: Some people have complained that this production just rehashes the original choreography: I don’t know what they’re talking about. The chain gang blocking is different, “Lovely Ladies” is different, the women’s pay-day line in “At the End of the Day” is gone, as is the conga line in “Beggars at the Feast,” and the staging is full of new ideas and innovations. Yes, some scenes draw on the original (e.g. the “triangle” in “One Day More;” the staging of Valjean’s death), but even then, they only draw on it, not copy it. In every scene I could tell that the directors put real effort into making their production new and different.

Obviously, some of the chief changes come from the fact that this production doesn’t have a revolving stage. “Attack on Rue Plumet,” for example, takes place in the garden rather than outside the gate (the gang picks the lock), and the lack of a moveable barricade alters several key moments. Gavroche’s death is only heard, not shown, and the classic tableau of Enjolras hanging dead from the barricade is replaced by the image of him lying on a cart pulled by a policeman after the barricade has been cleared away. Believe it or not, I liked those changes. Gavroche’s sound-only death at least spares us the bad acting we often see from little boys, and besides, it becomes a great character moment for Grantaire. While all the other rebels are staring over the barricade, watching Gavroche die, Grantaire, who is shown throughout to be the most attached to the boy, stands facing the audience with a look of abject horror and anguish. Then he screams “Noooo!” (melodramatic on the UK cast recording, but with the visuals it actually works) and falls weeping to his knees, while everyone else is silent and motionless. And don’t shoot me, but I didn’t hate Enjolras on the cart. It’s not the classic majestic tableau, but it doesn’t try to be. It emphasizes just what some people have said it does– the tragic disrespect with which the revolutionaries will be regarded after their deaths.

One of my favorite new stagings was “A Heart Full of Love.” It’s the first alternative staging I’ve seen to be just as adorable and poetic as the original. Cosette first appears on her balcony with Marius below, a la Romeo and Juliet. Then she runs away, hence Marius sings “I’m doing everything all wrong,” only for her to suddenly come out through the downstairs door, much to his surprise. Also, I remember one review of the UK tour complaining that Marius and Cosette’s romance was too eroticized: not so here, it felt very chaste. Throughout the song they never even touch, but only slowly approach and circle each other during the last verse, then finally kiss after the final note. Another lovely, poetic moment comes in the final scene: as Fantine and Éponine sing “Take my love…” they and Valjean walk toward the Planet backdrop (Heaven), but then Valjean turns back toward Cosette and Marius to sing “And remember…” and then all three spirits sing “To love another person…” not to each other or to the audience, but to Marius and Cosette. Also, I’m sure Hugophiles will be happy that the Bishop now appears as a spirit in the finale and Valjean bows to him when he sees him.

Another unique moment was the staging of Mme. Thénardier’s verse in “Master of the House.” It was the reverse of the original: instead of Mme. T. addressing to the customers while her husband was busy in the kitchen area, Thénardier was with the customers, regaling them with a story, while Mme T. worked in the kitchen area and sang her verse confidentially to the audience. An interesting choice, which combined with some of the other staging, seemed to offer the idea that Monsieur T. is the purer evil of the two, while his wife is a slightly less nasty figure with whom we might even empathize a bit.

This was just one of several details that made me suspect that the directors set out to make the production as “feminist” as possible. Any male abusers of women (the Foreman, Bamatabois, the two pimps, Thénardier and the gang toward Éponine) are portrayed especially viciously. Éponine’s toughness is almost too much– when Montparnasse gets fresh with her she grabs his arm and hurls him to the ground, martial arts-style. And strong emphasis is placed on Cosette’s blooming womanhood and conflict with Valjean. Twice after he refuses to give her explanations – first in “In My Life,” then, silently, in “One Day More” – she runs away from him into the house, leaving him looking distraught. Valid, but I missed the original production’s emphasis on the love between them, via his bringing out her old doll and their hug during “One Day More.” I was glad that Jenny Latimer played the role as sweetly as she did (and “…I have all that I want…” is reinstated), or I might not have felt like they had a good relationship at all. I did like the way her costumes and hair (worn down in Act I, up in Act II) reflected her maturing process, though.

Yet another thing I like about this production was that all the deaths are staged and acted as realistically as possible. “Come to Me” is such a realistic deathbed scene: Fantine doesn’t get out of bed, doesn’t even raise her head, she just lies there, feebly holding out her hand toward her hallucination of Cosette. Eponine and Valjean’s deaths felt realistic too, as did the deaths on the barricades. The Final Battle isn’t stylized slo-mo, but loud, chaotic and brutal, with lots of flashes, smoke and yelling. The only stylized death is Javert’s suicide, which I’m sure plenty of people will dislike for being more “spectacular” than the original. Javert is suspended in midair as the bridge flies up, then slowly pulled backward “into” the image of swirling water, all the while belting “…OOOOON!” I haven’t quite decided if I consider it effective, hammy, or a little bit of both.

I have to admit, the staging includes a few clunkers. The Confrontation dissolves into slight silliness, with Valjean and Javert effectively playing tug-of-war with a chain brought by the latter, which Valjean finally uses to strangle him into submission rather than threatening him with a chair leg. The staging of “Turning” is fine, with the women leaving candles on the now-empty site of the barricade, but “Empty Chairs,” with the students’ ghosts picking up the candles and with no chairs or tables in sight, felt iffy to me. I’m also sure that some people will complain (though I didn’t mind it) that nearly all the important solos (the Bishop’s “But remember this, my brother…” Grantaire’s verse in “Drink With Me,” etc.) are now placed squarely at center stage, lacking the subtlety of the original blocking. But ultimately none of these details detract from the quality of the production. Much to my surprise, and as much as I love the original, I’m perfectly happy with the fact that this one will be the new “standard” for the next several years.


Part 2 to come later. By the way, I couldn't think of where to fit this in, but the curtain call order has been changed slightly. Marius and Cosette now bow after Fantine and Éponine, which I'm sure some Hugophiles will love. :)


Mon Jun 20, 2011 9:03 am
Profile
Broadway Legend / MdN Veteran
Broadway Legend / MdN Veteran
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2004 6:17 am
Posts: 3976
Location: In a Lesbian trench coat.
Current Obsession: Being Squeaky.
Main Role: Fan
Post Re: Les Miserables in Los Angeles at the Ahmanson Theatre
Oh dear.

Just when I thought most fans more or less agreed on the same points (making it easier to predict how it's going to turn out for me), Vanessa comes in and shakes things up. 8-)

Most surprising is your thoughts on the tempo being perfectly fine, which made me very, very happy. But I now wonder why countless (not exaggerating) reviews and commentary I've read around the internet since the U.K. tour all say the tempo is way too fast. Maybe it was fast, but it just so happens it's not something that generally bothers you? Which--obviously--is fine.

Is the IDAD intro still on fast forward? And what's this thing of sustained note-cutting I've been reading about all over the internet?

Do you personally feel this stage version is like a blueprint for the upcoming film version?

Ahhh, I want to like! I want to like! XD

_________________
Image


Mon Jun 20, 2011 9:44 pm
Profile
Broadway Legend
Broadway Legend

Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 1:06 pm
Posts: 792
Post Re: Les Miserables in Los Angeles at the Ahmanson Theatre
I like fast tempos in general, but still, I never got any sense of "We have to finish by 11 on the dot so nobody gets paid overtime," and I'm pretty sure I would have noticed that.

Quique wrote:
Is the IDAD intro still on fast forward? And what's this thing of sustained note-cutting I've been reading about all over the internet?

Do you personally feel this stage version is like a blueprint for the upcoming film version?


Yes, the IDAD intro is still on fast forward. :cry: I suppose, since that song is now the show's most famous, they were aiming for some kind of emotional freshness, and they achieve it. Instead of gently and reflectively, Fantine now sings "There was a time..." with all the overwrought emotion of having just been fired. But still, it's awkward to transition so suddenly from the white-hot factory scene to a slow, mournful ballad, with no easing into it.

As for the second thing, I don't know. As for the third, maybe, but I kind of hope not. If the movie draws on any stage production (e.g. in terms of costume design) I'd rather it draw on the original, just because the original was "Les Mis" for so many years.

Now to get some sleep so I can write all my thoughts on the cast... :D


Mon Jun 20, 2011 11:34 pm
Profile
Broadway Legend / MdN Veteran
Broadway Legend / MdN Veteran
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2004 6:17 am
Posts: 3976
Location: In a Lesbian trench coat.
Current Obsession: Being Squeaky.
Main Role: Fan
Post Re: Les Miserables in Los Angeles at the Ahmanson Theatre
Los Angeles Times review:

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/culture ... eatre.html

I really like the never-before-seen photo, but why do all the women look exactly the same? lol.

_________________
Image


Tue Jun 21, 2011 5:08 am
Profile
Broadway Legend
Broadway Legend

Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 1:13 pm
Posts: 1886
Post Re: Les Miserables in Los Angeles at the Ahmanson Theatre
It's kinda hard to tell whether the LA Times liked it or not..lol

And there wasn't really any sound glitches. I've seen Mary Poppins and South Pacific at CTG and they literally had to stop the show to fix some technical problem. Les Mis just hummed along. She was right that it was LOUD though.


Wed Jun 22, 2011 9:48 am
Profile
Broadway Legend / MdN Veteran
Broadway Legend / MdN Veteran
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2004 6:17 am
Posts: 3976
Location: In a Lesbian trench coat.
Current Obsession: Being Squeaky.
Main Role: Fan
Post Re: Les Miserables in Los Angeles at the Ahmanson Theatre
I'm still intrigued (and rather creeped out) by the way every single female cast member in that photo appears to be the same person. Are you sure Sir Cammack hasn't employed robots to double for human actors? Roflmao.

Also, for that Bishop scene, at least, it's identical to the way it is always staged by the looks of it. Not that it's a bad thing. It's just that this is touted as an "OH SO REFRESHING PRODUCTION" when a lot of what I've been exposed to thus far is either ripped off or a tiny variation of the original sans revolve.

The way people fall all over each other over this NEW Les Mis, you'd think the Bishop entrance consists of a somersault, juggling the candlesticks as he lands on his feet as Valjean does an interpretive guilt tap stage left (the original is placed stage right, so that = no no).

So unfocused watercolor of church and random torches have been added to supplement the original brilliant composition and stage picture, colored with the marvelous light painting of David Hersey, with its amber glow upon the action and moody blues encapsulating the action, reproduced here by someone else.

Nice.

_________________
Image


Wed Jun 22, 2011 10:09 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 73 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.